Scopri nuova musica è un servizio di esplorazione musicale che ti offre consigli personalizzati in base alla musica che ascolti.

Crea il tuo profilo su Chiudi finestra

Wilhelm Friedemann Bach


I tag degli altri

Altri tag


Non è ancora disponibile una descrizione per questo artista, vuoi contribuire?

Album più ascoltati

Trend di ascolto

2.136ascoltatori totali
20.946scrobbling totali
Trend di ascoltatori recente:

Inizia a eseguire lo scrobbling e tieni traccia dei tuoi ascolti

Gli utenti di eseguono lo scrobbling della musica che ascoltano su iTunes, Spotify, sulla radio e su oltre 200 altri lettori.

Crea un profilo su


Aggiungi un commento. Accedi a o registrati.
  • OG-Gurda


    26 Mar 1:46 Rispondi
  • Synesthesis

    Excellent composer, he made the great music (mainly symphonies ) ,I consider CPE better because he did more music than WF, but both brothers did not cross the shadow of their genius father JSB.

    10 Feb 13:50 Rispondi
  • Artur_UFRJ

    Daddy's Pride.

    21 Apr 2012 Rispondi
  • Artur_UFRJ

    Nice fugues!

    17 Mar 2012 Rispondi
  • Antinomie__

    Anyways, the music itself is outstanding... So no matter how hard you try to call it or face it. But yeah I agree with the term that just calling it classical music is somehow useless.

    9 Ago 2011 Rispondi
  • Grosseteste

    "Classical" meaning "art music" or "serious music", or the like, is generally used by people who don't know much about music; it's also pretty well useless as a distinguishing term for anyone who listens to a lot of music (little better than tagging tracks simply as "music" in fact). I'd agree that there's nothing wrong with calling C.P.E. or W.F. Bach "classical", so (aside from the uncalled for aggression) I'd agree with Galgenterrorist's first comment; the second, aside from being even more pointlessly aggressive, is wrong though, I think. There's a line (not a precise line, but it's still there) between over-articulation and under-articulation; lumping Dowland and Boulez together as "classical" is pointless, while insisting on ever finer distinctions between slightly different styles would lead to us needing a different tag for every composer (or even for every piece).

    20 Apr 2010 Rispondi
  • beckkattack

    Allegro Assai, hell yes you were my solo and ensemble piece

    21 Giu 2009 Rispondi
  • Galgenterrorist

    By the way, "classical" music does not only mean the classical era (or its style, he? :P) but also the whole "common practice period". The use of this term may vary this often because of the ambiguity of the word itself. I think there are many other ways to tag composers of the classical era as what they are, so I never end to ask myself why people like you always complain. Do you think we're too stupid to know the more meanings of the term or do you want to dictate us the TRUE use of the word...? Think of both options, one is less likelier than the other.

    24 Apr 2009 Rispondi
  • Galgenterrorist

    Who says that tags have to -define- the artist by musical genres? Many tags are just for sake of description, so I don't see any problem in using the era AND the musical style. I mean, seriously, who thinks that "baroque" is a musical defined STYLE? It should be more than clear that it is a era which offers a lot of such.

    24 Apr 2009 Rispondi
  • SirAlecHendrix

    his music is not classical but galante (same with vivaldi who lived in the "baroque era"). era doesn't make the music.

    5 Set 2008 Rispondi