Gary Glitter

JoeDoeOwns ha scritto:

what a creep..

Visualizza profilo | Invia un messaggio nella bacheca di JoeDoeOwns

JckKrc ha scritto:

He's a nonce, a perv, a slot badger, a two pin plug, a bush dodger, a small bean regarder, a una bummer, a nut administrator and a bent ref. He's The Crazy World of Arthur Brown and a fence vole. He's free willy, a chimney bottler a bunty man and a shrub rocketeer.

Visualizza profilo | Invia un messaggio nella bacheca di JckKrc

jamesisace93 ha scritto:

I hope that he has a comeback tour one day. I know ill go! :) woop woop (8) Hello Hello Its good to be back its good to be back (8)

Visualizza profilo | Invia un messaggio nella bacheca di jamesisace93

Glamypunk ha scritto:

@redcrush well, I have to admit that my first post can easily be misunderstood. I always believed in Michael's innocence in this case as in many other cases. It is easy to see when people want to take revenge or make money. But Michael's behaviour was more than strange, so it was easy to put him into suspicion. Which leads us to the case Gary Glitter. He had illegal material on his laptop. I believe that to be true, though Gary always denied that. Also he denied having sex knowingly with underages in Vietnam. The court was taken behind closed doors and all proves the judges had were the sayings of the girls, who claim to be attacked sexually. They changed their accusation after they got money from GG. And, maybe you know, it is absolute usual in Vietnam to simulate a carcrash or to ascribe a crime to europeans to get money from them. So some doubts remain...

Visualizza profilo | Invia un messaggio nella bacheca di Glamypunk

xSTEx ha scritto:

What sparkles like a diamond and is small enough to fit in a schoolgirl's ring? Gary Glitter

Visualizza profilo | Invia un messaggio nella bacheca di xSTEx

redcrush ha scritto:

@polymorphous71: I fail to understand what my taste in music, or avatar, has to do with the facts. The fact of the matter is that Glamypunk still has no clue about what they're talking about or understands the deliberate use of my use of caps lock. Also, I happen to like the kind of music I like so why not just respect that instead of trying to attack me for it? I'm not here dissing yours. Thanks.

Visualizza profilo | Invia un messaggio nella bacheca di redcrush

polymorphous71 ha scritto:

Yeah but redcrush, it could be said that your fascination with MJ is a tad disturbing. I mean, even your avatar mate!?! Have a bit of imagination (I've seen your taste in music so, give the whole 'imagination thing' a whirl at least).

Visualizza profilo | Invia un messaggio nella bacheca di polymorphous71

redcrush ha scritto:

@Glamypunk: lol You are the first person I ever met online who said that. I'm assuming that you are just a generally ignorant person if you can not to understand something so simple as my deliberate use of the caps lock key.

Visualizza profilo | Invia un messaggio nella bacheca di redcrush

redcrush ha scritto:

@Glamypunk: Do us a favor and actually KNOW what you're talking about before you start sprouting off your uneducated opinions. There was NO evidence in Michael's case and plenty against Gary Glitter. If the FBI couldn't find anything on him what makes you think that you can? Oh that's right. b/c of you can't, because you have no clue about what you're talking about.

Visualizza profilo | Invia un messaggio nella bacheca di redcrush

Glamypunk ha scritto:

@thatspicegirl completely wrong, the main difference between the 2 cases is in my opinion that Michael had more money and his case wasn't courted in Vietnam, nothing much else. I am sure both are/were crazies, if not more.... noone will ever know the truth perhaps. Me, I don't believe in american justice and in vietnamese even less.

Visualizza profilo | Invia un messaggio nella bacheca di Glamypunk

polymorphous71 ha scritto:

xSTEx, well done for swearing and being a big man online. Easy to call someone a fucking moron when you aint in the same space as them.

Visualizza profilo | Invia un messaggio nella bacheca di polymorphous71

VEO15 ha scritto:

I use his music to lure prey

Visualizza profilo | Invia un messaggio nella bacheca di VEO15

Super_Jesus ha scritto:

thatspicegirl got it spot in. Annoying thing is I really like Gary Glitter's music but feel guilty listening to it =/

Visualizza profilo | Invia un messaggio nella bacheca di Super_Jesus

thatspicegirl ha scritto:

Why do you risk getting banned when you bash Michael on his page? Um, because he was PROVEN innocent WITH SOLID EVIDENCE and was a truly kind person who was taken advantage due to his generosity. The case against Michael was complete bullshit made up by psycho money-hungry parents. Glitter was PROVEN guilty WITH SOLID EVIDENCE. There was nothing to gain from accusing Glitter, while there was so much to gain from accusing Michael. When Michael's INSURANCE COMPANY (Not Michael himself, contrary to popular belief) offered the accuser's father (Who has since committed suicide) a $20 million settlement, suddenly everything was fine and he was no longer concerned with taking Michael to court. Tells you something there. Glitter did it because he was a pedophile. Michael was innocent because he was not. It's simple, really.

Visualizza profilo | Invia un messaggio nella bacheca di thatspicegirl

thatspicegirl ha scritto:

There was evidence for Gary Glitter, their wasn't any actual evidence in Jacksons case you fucking moron [2]. Precisely. Howeverrrr, it requires too much for MJ haters to read into MJ's case and see he was innocent. Glitter = guilty. Michael = Victim of extortion; should never have even been accused in the first place.

Visualizza profilo | Invia un messaggio nella bacheca di thatspicegirl

alexia_N ha scritto:

░░░░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ ░░░░░░░▓▓█░░░░██▓░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▓▓▓▓░░░ ░░░░░░░▓█░░░░░░█▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░▓▓████▓▓░░ ░░░░░░░▓█░░░█▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓███░░░░░▓░ ░░░░░░░▓▓██▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█░░░█▓░ ░░░░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█░█▓░░ ░░░░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█▓░░░ ░░░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░░░ ░░░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓████▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░ ░░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓██████▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓████▓▓▓░░░ ░░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓████▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓██████▓▓░░░ ░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓████▓▓▓░░░ ░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█░░░░░░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░░ ░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█░░░░░█████░░░░█▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░ ░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█░░░░░░░████░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░ ░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█░░░░░░░█░░░░░░█▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░ ░▓░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█▓█▒▒▒▒▒▒████▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░ ░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█▓█▒▒▒▒▒▒█▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░░ ░░░▓░▓▓░▓▓░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█▓▓█▒▒▒▒█▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░▓▓▓░░ ░░░░░░░░░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█▓▓███▓█▓▓▓▓▓░░░░░░░░░ PEDO PEDO PEDO PEDO PEDO PEDO PEDO PEDO PEDO PEDO

Visualizza profilo | Invia un messaggio nella bacheca di alexia_N

xSTEx ha scritto:

@polymorphous71 Their was evidence for Gary Glitter, their wasn't any actual evidence in Jacksons case you fucking moron.

Visualizza profilo | Invia un messaggio nella bacheca di xSTEx

xSTEx ha scritto:

░░░░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ ░░░░░░░▓▓█░░░░██▓░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▓▓▓▓░░░ ░░░░░░░▓█░░░░░░█▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░▓▓████▓▓░░ ░░░░░░░▓█░░░█▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓███░░░░░▓░ ░░░░░░░▓▓██▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█░░░█▓░ ░░░░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█░█▓░░ ░░░░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█▓░░░ ░░░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░░░ ░░░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓████▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░ ░░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓██████▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓████▓▓▓░░░ ░░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓████▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓██████▓▓░░░ ░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓████▓▓▓░░░ ░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█░░░░░░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░░ ░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█░░░░░█████░░░░█▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░ ░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█░░░░░░░████░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░ ░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█░░░░░░░█░░░░░░█▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░ ░▓░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█▓█▒▒▒▒▒▒████▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░ ░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█▓█▒▒▒▒▒▒█▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░░ ░░░▓░▓▓░▓▓░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█▓▓█▒▒▒▒█▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░▓▓▓░░ ░░░░░░░░░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█▓▓███▓█▓▓▓▓▓░░░░░░░░░ PEDO PEDO PEDO PEDO PEDO PEDO PEDO PEDO PEDO PEDO

Visualizza profilo | Invia un messaggio nella bacheca di xSTEx